2023 Preprint
What is a Pseudoscience of Consciousness? Lessons from Recent Adversarial Collaborations
Abstract: Some colleagues have questioned about our recent joint statement (Fleming et al 2023), so I try to address them here, as well as to provide some background. I also discuss what I think really went wrong with the recent adversarial collaboration on testing theories of consciousness (ARC-Cogitate), which has in part led to the statement. In a previous open review I already discussed the scientific content of their recent preprint. Here I focus on the institutional context, from my own personal perspective, as so…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
6
0
0
0
Citation Types
0
6
0
0
Year Published
2024
2025
Publication Types
Select...
4
2
Relationship
0
6
Authors
Journals
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
References 48 publications
0
6
0
0
“…A declaration of victory is difficult for us to see in the cited Science article (Finkel, 2023) or Nature article (Lenharo, 2023), though it may apply slightly more to articles in the Economist (2023) or the New York Times (Zimmer, 2023). Lau (2023) explained in more detail why he considered the IIT to be pseudoscience and disliked the process by which the adversarial collaboration was carried out. On September 18, 2023, on X (formerly Twitter), David Chalmers (@davidchalmers42) wrote, “IIT [information integration theory] has many problems but ‘pseudoscience’ is like dropping a nuclear bomb over a regional dispute.…”
Section: Strengths and Limits Of Various Theories Of Consciousnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A declaration of victory is difficult for us to see in the cited Science article (Finkel, 2023) or Nature article (Lenharo, 2023), though it may apply slightly more to articles in the Economist (2023) or the New York Times (Zimmer, 2023). Lau (2023) explained in more detail why he considered the IIT to be pseudoscience and disliked the process by which the adversarial collaboration was carried out. On September 18, 2023, on X (formerly Twitter), David Chalmers (@davidchalmers42) wrote, “IIT [information integration theory] has many problems but ‘pseudoscience’ is like dropping a nuclear bomb over a regional dispute.…”
Section: Strengths and Limits Of Various Theories Of Consciousnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… See Lau (2023), for a recent controversy regarding the scientific nature of the Information Integrated Theory of consciousness. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consciousness is not a function of these physical complexes, it is the complexes [ 10 ]. This important distinction led a prominent group of researchers to describe IIT as unscientific, even as pseudoscience [ 15 , 24 , 25 ]. The group highlighted the implausibility of IIT’s claim that a grid of connected logic gates could be conscious by virtue of their informational configuration, even when they were functionally inactive, a criticism applicable to all theories appealing to panpsychism.…”
Section: Published Critique Of Iit’s Conceptual Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
