2018
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1708274114
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

The preregistration revolution

Abstract: Progress in science relies in part on generating hypotheses with existing observations and testing hypotheses with new observations. This distinction between postdiction and prediction is appreciated conceptually but is not respected in practice. Mistaking generation of postdictions with testing of predictions reduces the credibility of research findings. However, ordinary biases in human reasoning, such as hindsight bias, make it hard to avoid this mistake. An effective solution is to define the research ques… Show more

View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1,724
181
145
45

Citation Types

11
1,555
2
28

Year Published

2000
2000
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
1,292
463
156
123

Relationship

27
2,007

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 1,963 publications

(1,604 citation statements)
references

References 71 publications

11
1,555
2
28
Order By: Relevance
“…This distinction is made especially relevant by the fact that the mean effect size revealed by the meta-analysis for both implicit ( β = 0.14) and explicit predictors ( β = 0.11) was small. In addition, also in line with recommendations by Kurdi et al ( 2019b ) and more general recommendations by Nosek et al, ( 2018 , 2019 ), we confirmed the exploratory results emerging from Studies 1–3 in a preregistered and highly powered final study (Study 4). Finally, and crucially, we made sure that the to-be-predicted behavioral measure had excellent validity and internal consistency.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…This distinction is made especially relevant by the fact that the mean effect size revealed by the meta-analysis for both implicit ( β = 0.14) and explicit predictors ( β = 0.11) was small. In addition, also in line with recommendations by Kurdi et al ( 2019b ) and more general recommendations by Nosek et al, ( 2018 , 2019 ), we confirmed the exploratory results emerging from Studies 1–3 in a preregistered and highly powered final study (Study 4). Finally, and crucially, we made sure that the to-be-predicted behavioral measure had excellent validity and internal consistency.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…Contrary to the present view, Nosek et al (2018) argued that nontransparent selective reporting inflates the Type I error rate. Consequently, as they explained, "transparent reporting that 1 in 20 experiments or 1 in 20 analyses yielded a positive result will help researchers identify the one as a likely false positive" (p. 2603).…”
Section: P-hacking During Single Tests Of Multiple Individual Null Hy...contrasting
confidence: 94%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…The benefits of preregistration indicated by our sample were associated with improved planning and documentation, transparency, higher quality, and replicability of research, which is consistent with the arguments for preregistration found in the literature (e.g., see [15,16,29]). The overall positive outlook found in our survey aligns with recent studies by Logg et al [27] and Sarafoglou et al [76] which also showed mostly positive attitudes of researchers regarding preregistration when inspecting generational differences and the perceived impact of preregistration on the research workflow.…”
Section: Positive Perception Of Preregistrationsupporting
confidence: 87%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.