2023
Morality's role in the Black Sheep Effect: When and why ingroup members are judged more harshly than outgroup members for the same transgression
Abstract: When and why might someone judge an ingroup transgressor more harshly than an outgroup transgressor? Taking a social functionalist perspective, we argue that morality is central to this phenomenon‐‐the Black Sheep Effect‐‐and that it is driven by social cohesion concerns. Using mediation and moderation methods across our studies, we find that people judge ingroup (vs. outgroup) transgressors more harshly because of concerns regarding ingroup social cohesion (Studies 1a–4). We also find that ingroup derogation …
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
11
3
1
0
Citation Types
1
5
0
0
Year Published
2024
2026
Publication Types
Select...
10
1
1
Relationship
0
12
Authors
Journals
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
References 82 publications
1
5
0
0
“…While some of these findings were inconsistent across studies, we believe they are consistent with recent research showing that ingroup moral deviance is more derogated than non‐moral deviance (Tang et al. 2023).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…While some of these findings were inconsistent across studies, we believe they are consistent with recent research showing that ingroup moral deviance is more derogated than non‐moral deviance (Tang et al. 2023).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Ramdass and Hogg (2019) found that people evaluate ingroup members more negatively when they act immorally rather than incompetently. Tang et al (2023) also found that people derogate ingroup members more harshly when they engage in moral (vs. non-moral) deviance.…”
Section: Social Judgements Ingroup Deviance and Realignment Tacticsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…High‐identifiers might engage in solidarity as a means to reaffirm ingroup social cohesion in response to morality concerns arising from ingroup transgressions (Tang et al. 2023). Future research, therefore, should examine the interplay between image and morality concerns to provide a more comprehensive understanding of high‐identifiers' motivations for outgroup solidarity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, while our research investigated the strategic aspects of high-identifiers' outgroup solidarity, their solidarity may extend beyond strategic motives (see Cameron et al 2015;Schein and Gray 2018). High-identifiers might engage in solidarity as a means to reaffirm ingroup social cohesion in response to morality concerns arising from ingroup transgressions (Tang et al 2023). Future research, therefore, should examine the interplay between image and morality concerns to provide a more comprehensive understanding of high-identifiers' motivations for outgroup solidarity.…”
Section: Limitations and Suggestions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While such initiatives might disrupt social cohesion at a lower level of social units and ties within the family, extended family and neighbourhood, it is important to recognise that, as Tang et al. (2023) argue, the black sheep effect might be driven by the need to protect social ties at a broader Mosul community level by portraying moral transgressors as being outside certain groups within the community. Simultaneously, contrary to the Social identity approach assumptions, instances of neighbourly help, occurring both within and between different groups in diverse neighbourhoods, suggest particularly salient identification with the neighbourhood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
