2020
Measurement Invariance of Two Measures of Alexithymia in Students Who Do and Who Do Not Engage in Non-suicidal Self-Injury and Risky Drinking
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
31
7
1
1
Citation Types
0
18
0
2
Year Published
2020
2025
Publication Types
Select...
22
8
7
1
Relationship
4
34
Authors
Journals
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
References 61 publications
0
18
0
2
“…Several DIF, DDF, and EOT facet scores and a total scale score can be derived. The PAQ has demonstrated good validity and reliability (e.g., Greene et al, 2020) and all subscale and total scale scores had good internal consistency in our sample (α ≥ .80).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Several DIF, DDF, and EOT facet scores and a total scale score can be derived. The PAQ has demonstrated good validity and reliability (e.g., Greene et al, 2020) and all subscale and total scale scores had good internal consistency in our sample (α ≥ .80).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Originally developed in English, several language translations of the PAQ have now been published, including Turkish (15), Iranian (16, 17), and Spanish (18) versions. Factor analyses across language versions have consistently supported a 5-factor structure, conforming to the intended five factors (13,19,20). The superiority of this five-factor model, in comparison to simpler models, has therefore supported the value of considering facet-level and valencespecific components in alexithymia assessments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…All subscale and composite scores in these studies had high internal consistency, and good concurrent and discriminant validity against measures of depression and anxiety symptoms and emotion regulation. Supporting the potential value of valence-specific assessment, participants reported more difficulties identifying and describing their negative emotions as compared to positive emotions, and the PAQ displayed better reliability coefficients and factorial validity than the TAS-20 ( 34 , 38 , 39 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
