2016
How open science helps researchers succeed
Abstract: Open access, open data, open source and other open scholarship practices are growing in popularity and necessity. However, widespread adoption of these practices has not yet been achieved. One reason is that researchers are uncertain about how sharing their work will affect their careers. We review literature demonstrating that open research is associated with increases in citations, media attention, potential collaborators, job opportunities and funding opportunities. These findings are evidence that open res…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
687
122
68
12
Citation Types
5
647
0
29
Year Published
2016
2026
Publication Types
Select...
566
158
69
59
Relationship
10
842
Authors
Journals
Cited by 836 publications
(681 citation statements)
References 113 publications
5
647
0
29
“…Concerning the association of code sharing with the conventional research citation rate and the alternative research metric Altmetric Attention Score, the results of this study did not find an association between code sharing and citation rate, but revealed a positive association between code sharing and Altmetric Attention Score. These findings are supported by previous research into open science practices which found similar increases in the number of mentions in alternative sources (Adie, 2014;McKiernan et al, 2016;Wang, Liu, Mao, & Fang, 2015).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Concerning the association of code sharing with the conventional research citation rate and the alternative research metric Altmetric Attention Score, the results of this study did not find an association between code sharing and citation rate, but revealed a positive association between code sharing and Altmetric Attention Score. These findings are supported by previous research into open science practices which found similar increases in the number of mentions in alternative sources (Adie, 2014;McKiernan et al, 2016;Wang, Liu, Mao, & Fang, 2015).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In accordance with studies by Lawrence (2001) and Piwowar et al (2007), McKiernan et al (2016) reported several studies that found a relationship between open access publishing and citation rates (Hitchcock, 2016;Adie, 2014;Eysenbach, 2006;Hajjem et al, 2006;cited in McKiernan, 2016). Moreover, McKiernan et al (2016) found open research practices to be associated with alternative research metrics as well. For example, open publications get more media coverage than articles that are not openly accessible (Adie, 2014a;Wang et al, 2015;cited in McKiernan et al, 2016).…”
Section: Impact Of Code Sharingsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Moreover, it has also been highlighted that authors may receive early media coverage based on preprints [27], which we see confirmed in our experience with a preprint based on an earlier version of this article [78,79]. Openness in science can even promote equality by making resource-costly data or rarely available observations accessible to a wider range of communities [74,75].…”
Section: Three Benefitssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The benefits of true transparency have been previously noted (22, 23), and we reiterate that our proposed solution has lasting positive effects for the principal investigator, funding agencies, peer review, collaborators, and the general public. The solution is flexible and applicable to the broad needs of multi-omics integration for climate research, clinical proteogenomics, systems biology, computational neuroscience, and so on.…”
Section: Looking Forwardsupporting
confidence: 70%
