2022
Finding our voice—Scholarship in peer review
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
3
1
0
0
Citation Types
0
3
0
0
Year Published
2023
2026
Publication Types
Select...
2
2
Relationship
0
4
Authors
Journals
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
References 4 publications
0
3
0
0
“…ASME and TCT launched the 'New Voices' award programme in 2021. Designed to support early-career HPE scholars, this initiative aims to develop peer review skills while amplifying voices that have historically lacked access to such opportunities due to geographic or other barriers [7]. This 9-month, fully virtual programme utilises a community of practice (CoP) model [8] to build peer review expertise, confidence, a sense of belonging and professional growth among a diverse, multidisciplinary group of early-career scholars from around the world.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASME and TCT launched the 'New Voices' award programme in 2021. Designed to support early-career HPE scholars, this initiative aims to develop peer review skills while amplifying voices that have historically lacked access to such opportunities due to geographic or other barriers [7]. This 9-month, fully virtual programme utilises a community of practice (CoP) model [8] to build peer review expertise, confidence, a sense of belonging and professional growth among a diverse, multidisciplinary group of early-career scholars from around the world.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] Despite its importance, the process of learning how to review a manuscript is largely informal and is not required in medical training. [9] Journals often call upon reviewers based on their content expertise; however, there are limited resources to train reviewers in critical appraisal, effective communication, and journalology. Further, one study suggested 20% of potential reviewers completed up to 94% of reviews, suggesting a shortage of engaged reviewers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, there is a need for programs to prepare early career physicians and scientists to participate in peer review. [9,14] A scalable, sustainable, effective program to teach physicians and scientists-in-training to conduct quality review would address these important gaps. In a prior randomized study, we developed an unstructured peer review training program and evaluated the impact of mentoring on peer review quality and knowledge of research methodology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
