2015
Emergence of system roles in normative neurodevelopment
Abstract: Adult human cognition is supported by systems of brain regions, or modules, that are functionally coherent at rest and collectively activated by distinct task requirements. However, an understanding of how the formation of these modules supports evolving cognitive capabilities has not been delineated. Here, we quantify the formation of network modules in a sample of 780 youth (aged 8-22 y) who were studied as part of the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort. We demonstrate that the brain's functional network…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
212
92
92
28
Citation Types
37
345
0
0
Year Published
2015
2026
Publication Types
Select...
263
75
14
14
Relationship
53
313
Authors
Journals
Cited by 357 publications
(383 citation statements)
References 36 publications
37
345
0
0
“…These represent, respectively, positive and negative associations between community membership and age, sex, and in‐scanner motion (Figure ). Consistent with the previous literature (Gu et al, ; Satterthwaite et al, ), we found that as age increased, there were more within‐community, rather than between‐community connectivity, that strengthened with age (Figure a). Conversely, as age increased, there were more between‐community, rather than within‐community connectivity, that weakened with age.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These represent, respectively, positive and negative associations between community membership and age, sex, and in‐scanner motion (Figure ). Consistent with the previous literature (Gu et al, ; Satterthwaite et al, ), we found that as age increased, there were more within‐community, rather than between‐community connectivity, that strengthened with age (Figure a). Conversely, as age increased, there were more between‐community, rather than within‐community connectivity, that weakened with age.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…When confining analysis to regions exhibiting significant effects, the findings were confirmed by the cross‐sectional approaches. The findings also agreed with existing adolescent literature, which mostly has reported on cross‐sectional rs‐fMRIs analysis using seed‐based (Fair et al, ; Sherman et al, ) or ROI‐based (Betzel et al, ; Cao et al, ; Gu et al, ) approaches.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Consistent with previous literature (20), we identified four major networks: the default-mode network, the central executive network, the sensorimotor network and the visual network (Figure 2, lower panel). There were no significant group differences in the number (Figure 2, top panel), size (Figure 2, second panel from the top) or structure (based on the Z-rand similarity index) (Figure 2, third panel from the top) of the modules at any spatial scale tested (as titrated by the structural resolution parameter), even at uncorrected p <0.05.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
