2024
Disinformation in Science: Ethical Considerations for Citing Retracted Works
Abstract: This paper discusses the ethical implications of citing retracted biomedical literature, particularly in the context of spreading misinformation within scholarly discourse. It examines the responsibility of scientists to combat disinformation and uphold ethical standards in their research practices. To guide our discussion, we studied citations of the most often cited retracted works containing disinformation in Web of Science. Our findings confirm prior research and demonstrate that most citations to retracte…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
1
1
0
0
Citation Types
0
1
0
0
Year Published
2022
2026
Publication Types
Select...
2
Relationship
0
2
Authors
Journals
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
References 43 publications
0
1
0
0
“…This problem occurs in various fields, including computer science and biomedical research, where retracted papers are often cited in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A major cause for this is that the authors are not informed about the status of article retractions, either because they do not receive enough notifications in journals and databases or because they depend on saved copies or find uncorrected versions available on open-access platforms (Million and Budd, 2024).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem occurs in various fields, including computer science and biomedical research, where retracted papers are often cited in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A major cause for this is that the authors are not informed about the status of article retractions, either because they do not receive enough notifications in journals and databases or because they depend on saved copies or find uncorrected versions available on open-access platforms (Million and Budd, 2024).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
