2023
Delineating between scientism and science enthusiasm: Challenges in measuring scientism and the development of novel scale
Abstract: Scientism proposes science to be an all-powerful human enterprise, able to answer not only all practical but also philosophical or moral questions. We are taking a psychological approach to scientism, studying uncritical trust in science and uncritical trust in scientists as a part of a unique attitudinal tendency. Our novel measure assesses both kinds of trust through short Thurstone scales allowing us to establish a clear threshold for endorsing scientism, thus effectively delineating it from science enthusi…
View preprint versions
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
5
1
0
0
Citation Types
0
3
0
0
Year Published
2024
2026
Publication Types
Select...
3
1
1
Relationship
0
5
Authors
Journals
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
References 51 publications
0
3
0
0
“…This selection was based, in part, on the EFA results from study 1: items that did not load on to any factors were dropped, as were items that loaded on to the scientism factor. The scientism factor was dropped in part because of overlap with a scale intended to measure scientism specifically (Lukić & Žeželj, 2023); and because we came to believe that, for the purposes of understanding the dynamics of public scientific controversies, scientism could be reduced to the idea that science is especially trustworthy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This selection was based, in part, on the EFA results from study 1: items that did not load on to any factors were dropped, as were items that loaded on to the scientism factor. The scientism factor was dropped in part because of overlap with a scale intended to measure scientism specifically (Lukić & Žeželj, 2023); and because we came to believe that, for the purposes of understanding the dynamics of public scientific controversies, scientism could be reduced to the idea that science is especially trustworthy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were then presented with five blocks of "perceptions of science" questions, including the finalized VISS items, a subset of the OSI 2.0 (Kahan, 2017), and three blocks with measures of generalized trust in science (i.e., trust in science generally, rather than trust in particular scientists or scientific institutions): the Credibility of Science Scale (CoSS; Hartman et al, 2017), the scientism scale developed by Lukić & Žeželj (2023), and a block of ad hoc questions: A question from the Pew Research Center (Tyson, 2023), "Overall, science has had a(n) ____ effect on society," with options "mostly negative," "equally positive and negative," and "mostly negative," along with variations on the General Social Survey's "confidence in institutions" questions: "Here are some influential institutions in this country. As far as the people running these institutions are concerned, how much confidence would you say that you have in them?"…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
