2017
Comparison of mucosal lining fluid sampling methods and influenza-specific IgA detection assays for use in human studies of influenza immunity
Abstract: We need greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying protection against influenza virus to develop more effective vaccines. To do this, we need better, more reproducible methods of sampling the nasal mucosa. The aim of the current study was to compare levels of influenza virus A subtype-specific IgA collected using three different methods of nasal sampling. Samples were collected from healthy adult volunteers before and after LAIV immunization by nasal wash, flocked swabs and Synthetic Absorptive Matrix …
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
22
6
5
4
Citation Types
1
24
0
0
Year Published
2018
2026
Publication Types
Select...
29
5
Relationship
8
26
Authors
Journals
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
References 24 publications
1
24
0
0
“…Normalization of SARS-CoV-2 WT-RBD IgA using total IgA further reduced the variability in serially collected samples, which is consistent with the study of de Silva et al. ( 26 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Normalization of SARS-CoV-2 WT-RBD IgA using total IgA further reduced the variability in serially collected samples, which is consistent with the study of de Silva et al. ( 26 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This was the first study to use SAM strips to collect samples for metabolomic analysis. The high yield of metabolites recovered by SAM strips reflects our recent experience with detecting virus-specific antibody where the SAM strips have significantly more concentrated sample recovery (de Silva et al, 2017). Interestingly in another study viral loads in nasosorption were several fold lower than in nasopharyngeal aspirate (NPA), another dilutional technique with variable yield (Thwaites et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Nasosorption is noninvasive and does not require rotation within the nostril, providing individuals with a more comfortable experience . Moreover, nasosorption using SAM strips enable the collection of more concentrated samples for analysis . The most critical step for NLF measurement is the elution of NLF from the SAM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several bioanalytical considerations were factored into the development of a PK assay for NLF. Collection of NLF has traditionally been performed using nasal washes or nasal swabs, which made it difficult to obtain suitable recovery of analytes, particularly where concentrations of target analytes are very low . Nasal swabs also require rotation within the nostril, which can be uncomfortable .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
