2014
CAD or MAD? Anger (not disgust) as the predominant response to pathogen-free violations of the divinity code.
Abstract: The CAD triad hypothesis (Rozin, Lowery, Imada, & Haidt, 1999) stipulates that, cross-culturally, people feel anger for violations of autonomy, contempt for violations of community, and disgust for violations of divinity. Although the disgust-divinity link has received some measure of empirical support, the results have been difficult to interpret in light of several conceptual and design flaws. Taking a revised methodological approach, including use of newly validated (Study 1), pathogen-free violations of th…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
109
19
7
4
Citation Types
12
107
1
1
Year Published
2014
2025
Publication Types
Select...
84
20
16
4
Relationship
9
115
Authors
Journals
Cited by 124 publications
(121 citation statements)
References 91 publications
12
107
1
1
“…Significant positive association between unethical leader behavior and moral anger reveal that moral emotions of followers may be provoked on observing leaders behaving unethically. The results are in line with previous studies that found that unethical leader behavior trigger negative emotions among followers in social exchange process (Hassan et al, 2022;Kirrane et al, 2017) specifically anger (Royzman et al, 2014). Lindebaum and Geddes (2016) and Lindebaum, Geddes and Gabriel (2017) also reported that moral emotions are generated due to leaders' ethical transgression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Significant positive association between unethical leader behavior and moral anger reveal that moral emotions of followers may be provoked on observing leaders behaving unethically. The results are in line with previous studies that found that unethical leader behavior trigger negative emotions among followers in social exchange process (Hassan et al, 2022;Kirrane et al, 2017) specifically anger (Royzman et al, 2014). Lindebaum and Geddes (2016) and Lindebaum, Geddes and Gabriel (2017) also reported that moral emotions are generated due to leaders' ethical transgression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our findings are consistent with those of Royzman et al (2014), who found that American participants’ reactions to pathogen-free sacred violations did not show core disgust-related features such as nausea, gagging, loss of appetite, and a desire to move away. Additionally, we found that sacred violations not involving pathogens are not gross, even for Indians.…”
Section: General Discussion and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…That result, together with Nabi's result, should caution emotion theorists about their assumption that use of the word disgust always implies the same emotion. Our results particularly resonate with those of Royzman et al (2014), who found a similar division to the one seen here: The emotion evoked by physical contaminants may not be the same emotion evoked by moral violations (see also Russell, Piazza, & Giner-Sorolla, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
