2025
Best practices of judicial governance: A scoping review protocol
Abstract: Background Enhancing performance in the public sector is closely tied to institutional structures, governance models, and the behavior of public officials. In the Judiciary, these factors significantly affect the effectiveness of court administration and justice delivery. Judicial governance is a complex and evolving concept encompassing standards and practices related to accountability, independence, resource management, and institutional performance, progressively integrating principles from public managemen…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
1
1
0
0
Citation Types
0
12
0
0
Year Published
2025
2025
Publication Types
Select...
2
Relationship
1
1
Authors
Journals
Cited by 1 publication
(14 citation statements)
References 52 publications
0
12
0
0
“…Ethical approval is not typically required for systematic review studies, as they generally analyze previously published studies or publicly available evidence (i.e., secondary data). The results and conclusions obtained will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, contributing to the advancement of the research area and supporting further investigation [ 23 ].…”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethical approval is not typically required for systematic review studies, as they generally analyze previously published studies or publicly available evidence (i.e., secondary data). The results and conclusions obtained will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, contributing to the advancement of the research area and supporting further investigation [ 23 ].…”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prospective registration plays a crucial role in disclosing the study's methodological details, enabling peers to verify whether all procedures were conducted and reported as initially planned [ 17 ]. Any amendments to the protocol during the study will be updated in the registration record and clearly reported in the final manuscript presenting the systematic review results [ 23 ]. Furthermore, this type of study does not require ethical approval, as it involves no direct interaction with human participants and relies solely on secondary data from previously published sources [ 24 ].…”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
