2007
Age differences in resistance to peer influence.
Abstract: Prior research describes the development of susceptibility to peer pressure in adolescence as following an inverted U-shaped curve, increasing during early adolescence, peaking around age 14, and declining thereafter. This pattern, however, is derived mainly from studies that specifically examined peer pressure to engage in antisocial behavior. In the present study, age differences and developmental change in resistance to peer influence were assessed using a new self-report instrument that separates susceptib…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
1,139
231
178
102
Citation Types
67
1,194
17
31
Year Published
2000
2026
Publication Types
Select...
1,221
114
88
47
Relationship
39
1,431
Authors
Journals
Cited by 1,418 publications
(1,309 citation statements)
References 50 publications
67
1,194
17
31
“…Results show that peer prejudice affects individual-level prejudice over time, demonstrating adolescents' susceptibility to social influence. While previous research finds that resistance to peer pressure increases between 14 and 18 years of age (Steinberg and Monahan 2007), our results indicate that susceptibility to social influence does not disappear. This coefficient is 0.30 and, on a four-point scale, translates into a fairly large effect.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Results show that peer prejudice affects individual-level prejudice over time, demonstrating adolescents' susceptibility to social influence. While previous research finds that resistance to peer pressure increases between 14 and 18 years of age (Steinberg and Monahan 2007), our results indicate that susceptibility to social influence does not disappear. This coefficient is 0.30 and, on a four-point scale, translates into a fairly large effect.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to prior literature (Steinberg & Monahan, 2007) and what was initially hypothesized earlier in the study, peer conformity did not show a positive relationship with youth theft behavior. One explanation for this finding may relate to the nature of theft behavior.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…African American boys were particularly likely to succumb to social pressure regarding sexual behavior. This contrasts prior work on self-reported resistance to peer influence 11 and research on susceptibility to peer norms regarding alcohol use, both of which had demonstrated that African American adolescents were less susceptible than Caucasian youth. 21,22 These findings suggest that different peer socialization processes may be at play for substance use versus sexual activity among African American boys.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
